Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softros LAN Messenger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Feb. 27, '06 [08:11] <freakofnurxture|talk>

[edit] Softros_LAN_Messenger

self promotion Crea7or 20:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

    • Crea7or's original nomination comment was deleted by serlogin. I readded it, above. --Karnesky 20:12, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, advertisement, no encyclopedic value. Pavel Vozenilek 22:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For everyone's info, if it means anything, all of this nom's contributions are related to LanTalk XP and [[LanTalk NET] (See their deletion logs. Thanks. --Perfecto 02:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. While I cringe at some of Crea7or's contributions, this seems to be non-notable software. --Karnesky 09:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Ad spam. UncleFloyd 03:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Save, what's wrong with it? Where is the different between posting info about ICQ, MSN or this Messenger? (--unsigned post by User:serglogin)
  • Save, I can't see any promotional ads. They presented a program description. That's all. (--unsigned post by User:Alexrey)
    • And it was his 4th edit. His first was to the article, itself. His second and third were to put a link to a Softros program on other pages. --Karnesky 20:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • May be you are worried about external link through the description, now I have moved it to "external links" section bottom the main text. serglogin
    • Advertising your own products on Wikipedia in any form is frowned on. Please see WP:SOFTWARE for suggestions on what software warrants an article. IF it was notable softwre, have the external link would probably be O.K. (on this page only--not the other pages you and Alexray added them to). I don't think it is "notable." --Karnesky 20:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.