Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sodastream
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sodastream
Non-notable product; article reads more like an advertisement Todd(Talk-Contribs) 08:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I am not sure we have a policy on household appliances but I'm sure this would make it. It is certainly widely-known in Scotland. Catchpole 09:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and merge info from Soda-Club. Yomanganitalk 09:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- The info from Soda-Club and Milkstream has been merged and the article has been rewritten and sources provided (Uncle G is at work, though yet to pop up here). Yomanganitalk 10:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 10:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - sound article about a notable if not particularly interesting subject. BTLizard 12:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep this was a "must have" back in the day. I must still have one somewhere... Guy 13:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep but Wikify. Legis 14:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - notable product. Grutness...wha? 00:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - surprised not to find anything on the device that basically pre-dates it, the soda syphon - hunted under all names I could think of. Ace of Risk 14:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- It gets a very brief mention (under the name seltzer bottle) in Carbonated water Yomanganitalk 14:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Look. I have a Super Mario Bros. Super Show VHS tape here somewhere. It has an advertisement of these things in the beginning. Damn corny one too. That was in late 1980s/early 1990s. The chances are that if you mention Sodastream to any random Nintendo fan in Finland nowadays, there's a good chance they'll laugh along. =) In other words, yeah, I've heard of them and they're probably pretty notable. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep A very famous product in the UK, especially in the 1970's and 80's. Article might need a bit of a polish, but not deletion. - X201 15:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. As others have stated, this was an iconic product of the 1970s/80s in the UK. It featured as such in the recent series of decade-by-decade television programmes (the title of which I'm currently blanking on, sorry). Espresso Addict 17:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- "I love the 70's". Although the Wikipedia entry is just full of the US version. - X201 22:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, that was it. Though Sodastream doesn't seem to have made it to the website, it was definitely included in one of the programmes. Espresso Addict 23:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- I suggest that both of you read the encyclopaedia article that you are discussing more closely. ☺ Uncle G 11:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Just explaining your point would be more civil. - X201 12:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- That was a perfectly civil suggestion. Uncle G 02:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, yes! I rarely read beyond the references. Espresso Addict 17:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Just explaining your point would be more civil. - X201 12:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- I suggest that both of you read the encyclopaedia article that you are discussing more closely. ☺ Uncle G 11:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, that was it. Though Sodastream doesn't seem to have made it to the website, it was definitely included in one of the programmes. Espresso Addict 23:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- "I love the 70's". Although the Wikipedia entry is just full of the US version. - X201 22:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.