Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Gaming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Creation of a disambiguation page. -- lucasbfr talk 17:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Social Gaming
contested prod. This article was originally an advert for a LAN center. The mention of the center was removed with the prod, but now it only looks like an unsourced article consisting of original research. The article is orphaned -- lucasbfr talk 10:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 13:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: What about a redirect to LAN party? Slavlin 19:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect/Disambig Redirecting to LAN party is fine, though I wouldn't mind turning it (or social gaming, actually) into a disabig page with links to LAN party, MMO, etc. - Koweja 03:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Disambig Good idea Koweja. I'm being bold and will just edit the article into that. --User:Krator (t c) 22:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment good job. I think it looks good now. I say that this could probably be closed if an Admin sees it and is ok with the way it looks now. Can't see any controversy with it and it seems like a likely search phrase for any of the ones now listed. Slavlin 02:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- It can probably be speedy closed since the original nomination reason no longer applies. Koweja 02:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I believe an AFD can only be speedy kept if there are no votes for deletion and the nominator has withdrawn his nomination. —Mitaphane ?|! 02:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Remember that these are not decided by headcount/votes. There is no official policy I am aware of for keeping a discussion open just because, espcially when the circumstances have changed. Slavlin 16:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I believe an AFD can only be speedy kept if there are no votes for deletion and the nominator has withdrawn his nomination. —Mitaphane ?|! 02:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- It can probably be speedy closed since the original nomination reason no longer applies. Koweja 02:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Disambig -- Sounds like a plan! MrMacMan 22:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Fine with me, my problem was about the original article, this one has nothing to do with the previous one. I will go bold and speedy close the AfD. -- lucasbfr talk 17:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
