Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So Excited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, redirecting. W.marsh 23:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] So Excited

Article is pure speculation. There is no official confirmation that "So Excited" will become a single or that it will be released. Until there is such confirmation, the article serves no purpose except to reflect speculation. A section about the single did appear on the producers website, but that information has been removed; that leads to debate about whether it was/is ever planned for release, about whether Virgin has taken down the info to conceal the release until nearer the time or whether it was just wrong information. Regardless, that debate is again, speculation. Rimmers 14:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Khia's website did confirm that this will be a single... and alot of information has been released about this song (producer, music type, and has even been reviewed by SOHH). None of that would have happened for just an album cut. So what damage is it doing being on here? Why is it so neccessary to be deleted, if someone has read the article at SOHH and wanted to learn more about this song, why not hit up Wikipedia? If we find out that no, it won't be the next single, then it can be deleted. Thankyoubaby 22:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This AfD nomination was incomplete, listing now. — TheKMan^talk 04:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to the song's album 20 Years Old, then when it comes out it can have it's own page again. That way we won't lose the effort some users put into this article...Thankyoubaby 05:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Adambiswanger1 05:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this doesn't exist yet, has not become notable as such, and shouldn't be here unless it does both. Opabinia regalis 06:20, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for crystal-balling. --Coredesat 07:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with the relevant album Twenty Years Old until it is released as a single and becomes a hit. My understanding is that is the appropriate action under WP:MUSIC. Capitalistroadster 09:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for now. --Xyrael ^T 17:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 02:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to 20 Years Old. -- getcrunkjuice 16:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge into 20 Years Old. Until Virgin confirms its release, it doesn't belong here. -- eo 23:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.