Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snsnewsnow.blogspot.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete; only keep votes are IPs/unsigned.. Ral315 (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Snsnewsnow.blogspot.com

Delete. This is at best a page about a non-notable website. At worst it is a vanity page. Wikipedia is not an internet directory. Either way it is non-encyclopedic. cmh 23:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Hello. I'm the person in charge of the blog (sns news). I think it's fine if someone wants to make a page about my site. I also think that the article/page could be improved - but Not deleted. If Wikipedia can have a page about Drudge it can have a page about SNS NEWS. Non-notable website?? It's not a big site but I do happen to have a large following when it comes to people interested in C.S. Lewis books the Chronicles of Narnia. Overall, I fail to see why it should be completely deleted.

Oppoo, no offense is intended, but the fact that many users like your website doesn't make it an appropriate topic for Wikipedia. I have many websites, some that thousands and thousands have visited, but they aren't appropriate for an encyclopedia which is what this is, so they do not appear in Wikipedia. Ask yourself if you would expect to see an entry on your website in any other encyclopedia. Although it isn't prohibited, it is recommended that people not write about themselves or their projects because of this problem of objectivity. I would recommend that you start by writing articles on different topics to build up your experience before trying to write about yourself. For now, IMO, this page does not belong on wikipedia which is why I have nominated it for deletion. (By the way, please sign your comments by typing four tildes in a row at the end of them like this:~~~~ ) -- cmh 00:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete its a blog site. --James 00:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep- it is an Organization,If the reason you want to delete it is because it is a blog, then you better get rid of Power Line article (the article says, “Power Line is a conservative blog run by three lawyers: John H. Hinderaker ("Hindrocket"), Scott W. Johnson ("The Big Trunk") and Paul Mirengoff ("Deacon").”). That is not a reason to delete it.71.245.65.29 02:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, a blog which may have led to Dan Rather's CBS firing has a claim to notability. I don't see a parallel for this blog. -- cmh 03:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Well-intended article, but gives no indications of passing WP:WEB. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep Why did you not state that in the first place? Sorry, what claim fame does a fork have? The rules don’t say that the thing your writing about has to be famous. Okay so you say you can’t have it because it’s a about blog (but its also an organization) then when I correct that, you say because it’s not famous, I think your making up rules.71.245.65.244 04:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• • The guidelines are at WP:WEB, or if you prefer the similar guidelines for companies at WP:CORP. They do say it should be notable. Consensually approved, not made up on the spot. 05:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB, per the above comments. Sandstein 05:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. This AfD seems to have slipped through the cracks. Any admin out there have this page on a watchlist and feel like closing it? -- cmh 02:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.