Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowball Fight Techniques

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Snowball Fight Techniques

Snowball Fight Techniques (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is very probably original research. Furthermore, I think that the article snowball fight can cover all the subject matter. Cenarium (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Doesn't have a snowball's chance of survival. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete it's snowing! JuJube (talk) 01:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Let it snow... --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above... I'll defer to the closing administrator to say what we're all dying to say. Mandsford (talk) 03:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Close per WP:SNOW? Sorry, couldn't resist. Delete. Original research.Brian Waterman, MS, CDP (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:OR and poor capitalisation as per WP:NAME otherwise a simple redirect to Snowball fight could be used. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as Wikipedia isn't a how-to guide. Also filled with original research Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 16:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as the article is all original research and references cannot be found –Dream out loud (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. We do not need unsourced how-to guides. This may be appropriate as a section in the article, and would be better if it had a few references, but as an article itself as a how-to guide and no references is not appropriate. I've never been much of a deletionist, but this article is not suitable for Wikipedia. It's better off on Wikihow. So, my vote will be delete unless sources can be added and made less how-to. Otherwise, either delete completely or move to Wikihow. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 19:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Yellow snow (delete) How to guide, some of the throws sound made-up. Someoneanother 23:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.