Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow (Hey Oh)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Stadium Arcadium. It has actually already been done by an anon IP. Good deal. Proto||type 09:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Snow (Hey Oh)

Delete by WP:NOT crystal ball. Tony Bruguier 01:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep as possibly notable. I don't think crystal ball applies here, as it is clear that the song is going to be released (the single part is pure speculation, to be sure), so it becomes a notability issue. Is the song justified as notable beyond a possible single?Lakhim 01:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think this is crystal ballism. I think the song just isn't notable. As of now, the only single from the album is "Dani California", so unless this song becomes a single- and then a hit single- it doesn't have the notability to be on WP. Otherwise, every track from every album would have its own page. -- Kicking222 01:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Kicking222. After review of the song criterion for notability, this song currently fails, my fault for not reviewing it first. It can always be restored later. Lakhim 01:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Stadium Arcadium until notable -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 01:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Stadium Arcadium until notable. Definitely not a crystal ball issue. —Mets501^talk 02:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to Stadium Arcadium, crystal ballism, nn as for now. --Terence Ong 05:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Stadium Arcadium per User:Mets501. JIP | Talk 08:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect I always redirect random songs to their performers - why not. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect To Stadium Arcadium. There is no real reason for this song to have it's own page untilit is at least confirmed as a single.- Sabbre
• Keep due to the other information concerning the song presented in the article (this is NOT a crystal ball issue) and the article's potential for even more info. Why delete, saying you can restore later? Space isn't an issue. » K i G O E | talk 00:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but expand. 65.43.218.53 20:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.