Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap change

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Snap change

Delete. Prod tag was removed. Sending here for review. Article appears to be used as ad conduit. Monkeyman^(talk) 01:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Copyvio. Copied from [1] Fan1967 02:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• (Speedy) Delete as copyvio, tagged as such. Even if allowed, not really notable enough for its own page. Turnstep 03:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: copyvios are not speediable unless they are from commercial content providers and less than 48 hours old. The site may qualify as a commercial content provider, as they appear to use the content to sell advertising space, but it is much older than 48 hours. -- Kjkolb 11:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Fair enough, removed the speedy bit. Turnstep 14:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as copyvio, mentioned above.  (aeropagitica)  07:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, copyvio. --Terence Ong 10:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio Avi 21:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advert. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 22:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advert/copyvio. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate magic encyclopedia. -- Krash (Talk) 15:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.