Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap-a-cracker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW and WP:NFT Daniel Case 14:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Snap-a-cracker

Snap-a-cracker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Personal game played by limited people, unsourceable. Pilotboi / talk / contribs 05:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Apparently Wikipedia is not for something you made up in school one day. The article itself states that it was made up one day (albeit, at work). See the connection? Calgary 06:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:MADEUP and unsourced. Dbromage [Talk] 06:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Must've been a slow days for these folks. WP:MADEUP Realkyhick 06:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Definitely falls into things made up one day. I'm glad these aren't my employees. Useight 06:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable and made up. Jmlk17 06:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Dfrg.msc 07:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 11:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete- per nom and reasons above. The sunder king 11:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete as failing WP:NOR and WP:V very badly.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - far too young to be notable. Onnaghar ^{tl | co} 12:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.