Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smopping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 15:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smopping

The article is a badly written dictionary article for a word that does not exist. Uncle G 09:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Belongs in Wikitionary at the most, but I don't think it deserves that. -Iten 09:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Non-existent words do not belong in Wiktionary. Uncle G 09:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as nonsense, doesn't even belong in wiktionary --Quarl 09:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Please don't abuse the speedy deletion criteria. Only patent nonsense is speedily deletable. Patent nonsense is not the same as nonsense. Uncle G 19:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete quickly. Thanks for the advice, Uncle G --Quarl 23:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete garbage. --Oscarthecat 10:17, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above VegaDark 10:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Movementarian 11:13, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.