Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smoothy (eunuch)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smoothy (eunuch)

Previously PROD'd, but the source is slightly off. If it is to exist, then at least merge; it will remain nothing more than a stub. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 19:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Trans-wiki to Wiktionary. Nothing more than a definition, no potential for expansion. The source is a well-known body modification site. Ckessler 19:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary Where ^(talk) 20:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 05:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above. --Danielrocks123 05:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Coredesat 07:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Otherwise, if there is a dictionary for slangs, then transwiki it there. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 13:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, no merge, no redirect. This is more bizarre sexcruft, and it's a dicdef that can't be expanded even if it were worth expanding. So what if there are crazy perverts out there who cut off their dicks, balls, and nipples and call themselves a "smoothy." I call them fucking crazy. Erik the Rude 22:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef. Tychocat 07:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Erik the Rude. This doesn't enter into the decision, but the eunuch fetishists are more disturbing to me than any other paraphilia, including pedophilia, as their fantasies usually include children getting their penis, testicles, labia, clitoris or breasts cut off, almost always against their will. They are often tortured and/or killed as well. Unfortunately, Wikipedia has many links to a site with tons of stories like that and a few pictures and videos of baby circumcision, female genital mutilation and mutilated adult genitals (the pictures and videos are usually hosted offsite on members' websites and such, but they are linked to and sometimes loaded on the website). -- Kjkolb 09:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Uneasy Delete There is no possibility for expansion, and it is nothing more than a dictionary definition. However, I am uncomfortable with the idea that it should be removed because you don't like the fetish. There are many things on Wikipedia that are not to my liking, but I don't advocate for their removal. Ckessler 02:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.