Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smoal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Smoal
This word doesn't need a page on WP; a dictdef at most on Wiktionary. Not notable in its own right. -- (aeropagitica) 
16:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- smoal is not the stupidest or even the most useless word on wikipedia. in addition, nobody has been harmed in any way by smoal having been put onto this website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.247.177 (talk • contribs)
- I feel that smoal is fast becoming part of the internet vernacular. It deserve to be here just as much as "blog" or "WTF" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.84.192 (talk • contribs) 2006-01-01 00:03:45 UTC
- You "feel"? Do us all a favor and go play chicken with a freight train to rid us of such inanity. Delete. --Agamemnon2 15:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- There was no call whatsoever for that. Uncle G 17:17, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- You "feel"? Do us all a favor and go play chicken with a freight train to rid us of such inanity. Delete. --Agamemnon2 15:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. --Daveb 15:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Being familiar with the Red vs Blue series and the very, very narrow context in which it's used, I'd say that the corresponding dialogue now over at Wikiquote suffices. The only way that smoal would possibly fit anywhere in WP would be if it were eventually covered in a guide for the special one-off episodes of RvB that exist outside the main storyline. But I don't see such a guide as being necessary, and especially not to the level of detail where smoal is explicitly mentioned. -- TKD 11:18, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
