Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smirking Chimp (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already deleted. This is a procedural close, the article was already deleted but this page was not closed completely. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 08:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Smirking Chimp

Smirking Chimp (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Blog deleted via an AFD that was part of "GNAA's war on blogs". At deletion review concerns were raised about whether or not deletion was in line with consensus of Wikipedians, so it is back for further consideration. This is a technical nomination, I offer no opinion. GRBerry 01:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - any site with over a million Google hits is definitely noteworthy. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 00:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• I agree - this article should not be deleted. It is a site that deserves to be remembered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.210.90.180 (talk • contribs)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless sources verifying notability per WP:WEB can be produced. Alexa rank in the 200,000s. I couldn't find useful sources by googling, but I may have missed some. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability through reliable sources. Google hits (which largely seem to be just mentions in other blogs in this case) are not an indicator of notability per WP:WEB. WarpstarRider 12:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No notability evidenced Regan123 13:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - completely unsourced, no assertion of notability, no reason for us to think this passes WP:N or WP:WEB. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 14:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete- It asserts of notability; but I stick with the reason to why it was deleted the first time. Retiono Virginian 15:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Again, MySpace is a blog and does meet WP:N and WP:WEB, but this one doesn't. Sr13 (T|C) 23:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.