Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smiler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 13:40, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Smiler

Article does not establish notability. RickK 01:03, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-9 01:07 Z
  • Delete, article does not establish notability, possible vanity or prank. Megan1967 02:10, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Rje 03:22, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Googling for "smiler" + "filton" gives no evidence of this. JoaoRicardo 04:34, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. vanity. The Jacobin 05:44, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. ugen64 05:45, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Successful attempts at drawing attention encourage further attempts. Why was this not speedy deletion? --Wetman 05:55, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Because Anthony di Pierro would have listed it on VfU if I had. RickK 06:17, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pure garbage. — Brim 09:26, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete my guess is it's some minor-league tagger. Not notable enough anyway. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:33, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, for pity's sake. Deb 18:03, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. The name is most notable as a Rod Stewart album from the mid-1970's.Capitalistroadster 23:29, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. Carrp | Talk 03:44, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete--User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 05:47, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.