Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smeek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DS 13:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smeek

This would appear to be a classic case of WP:NEO. The term is apparently in popular use at one forum. A quick check of the first couple pages of search engine results shows no verifiable secondary source. To the extent that this is verifiable, it fails WP:OR Erechtheus 05:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Hetar 05:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Several entries at Urban Dictionary, however none of them pertaining to this particular definition, also very few google hits that use it in the context presented by the article. tmopkisn ^tlka 06:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There are several, unrelated entries on the urban dictionary. Looking on google, not many people using it in this context. --Xrblsnggt 06:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Urban Dictionary, being a web site that encourages people to submit things that they have just made up, is not a source. Uncle G 09:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Never said it was... tmopkisn ^tlka 06:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and tmopkisn. - makomk 11:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.