Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Wrestling Fan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Smart Wrestling Fan

Smart Wrestling Fan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not seem to meet notability, all refs in the article are self referential, no outside perspective of notability. Ruhrfisch 03:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete podcast article with no reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • No reliable sources? How is the official site not a reliable source? I hope you delete every podcast that uses its homepage as a reference then.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JalenJade (talk • contribs)
  • The sources have to be independant of the subject. TJ Spyke 04:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't appear to be a notable podcast, lots of podcasts are distributed on iTunes. TJ Spyke 04:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete official websites are never reliable sources. JuJube 04:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Secondary sources are lacking. ¿ςפקιДИτς! ☺ ☻ 15:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Does the rating on the Digg page not prove notability as this has been voted in so to speak? Gigolo
• Delete Non-notable in general and when applying the guidelines the podcasting project is using. Leaves just a tiny bit of a VSCA after-taste (or is that my OJ? ;). Seed 2.0 20:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, not notable in the slightest. RFerreira 07:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.