Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small penis humiliation (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

delete. DS 21:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Small penis humiliation

Appears to be a hoax. Mentions psychologists, but does not provide sources or links. Google search links to porn sites and link/meta crawlers, no encyclopedic info found. Prior AfD was no consensus. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 21:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Links are a paysite, a broken link, and a BBC report which discusses small penises but /not/ SPH. No professional refs; only pornsites. Porncruft. Bridesmill 22:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as likely hoax or wishful thinking. Bucketsofg 23:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Haw haw haw, very jocular. Delete. -- Hoary 00:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Hawkestone 06:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree that this article is mortally compromised by a lack of good sources, per Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. References to publications on penile size per se do not do anything to support the article; the references must document the specific phenomenon it is claimed exists. If there are no reputable published sources, writing about the subject from personal experience, or based on postings on various blogs/websites/pornsites/other stuff that does not meet Wikipedia:Reliable sources, violates the no original research policy. In simple terms, a subject on which there are no high quality publications cannot be written up in an encyclopedia. —Encephalon 15:25, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and all above. I didn't see any valid reasons for keeping in the last AFD so I think it should have been deleted then. Шизомби 23:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
• delete as above Pete.Hurd 19:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.