Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smackdown vs raw 2009

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted. Page existed solely to say "there is [sic] no details". Pagrashtak 16:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Smackdown vs raw 2009

Smackdown vs raw 2009 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete no indication of notability and WP:CRYSTAL Carlossuarez46 21:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Could have been speedied, IMO. Keeper | 76 22:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Thought about it, but some people would find sufficient context there, and/or claimed an assertion of notability, less wikidrama for these fan-fanatic type pages going this route. Carlossuarez46 20:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete - if there are no details available at this time, we shouldn't have a page. - DrWarpMind 03:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete I'm forced to agree, if there are no details, then there's no need for an article to reference them. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 04:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.