Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slothism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g1, patent nonsense, will protect. NawlinWiki 04:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Slothism
Hoax article, previously prodded and deleted, speedied per A1, and recreated again this time. Author removed prod, so I am bringing here for consensus Neil916 (Talk) 00:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete, violates WP:V; not even a plausible or humorous hoax. --Kinu t/c 00:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as complete WP:BOLLOCKS EliminatorJR Talk 00:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The information can't be verified; the doctors mentioned at the bottom of the article don't seem to exist. WODUP 00:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. - Aagtbdfoua 01:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, hoax. -- Mithent 01:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per above. Lemonsawdust 01:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 01:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - per all above, tagged as speedy.--Bryson{Talk}{Edits} 02:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete and Salt. Complete nonsense. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but previous deleted versions are all very different from this one so this is not a re-creation per CSD G4. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-17 03:14Z
- Delete and consider salting per everyone. --Charlene 03:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
