Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slitz

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:58, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Slitz

Unless more information can be added I see no point in having this on Wikipedia.bakuzjw (aka 578) 02:08, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and Expand But without more info, deleteZantastik 03:11, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, platform for an external link. (This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution.) —Korath (Talk) 00:48, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, this magazine is very notable in the Nordic countries. — JIP | Talk 04:53, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as there is no content. Then list on requested articles. Radiant_* 07:56, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and expand. Megan1967 08:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Very Strong Keep, and invite expansion. Oliver Keenan 10:44, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a valid stub. Notable magazine. Jeltz talk 16:28, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep notable. Oliver Keenan 10:05, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.