Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slip A Buck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower ^háblame 21:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Slip A Buck

• Delete. You guys can go ahead and delete this. I am the proprieter of Slip A Buck. Been working hard these last few weeks trying to get the site off the ground. Talking to artists, getting business stuff squared away, etc.. Looks like somebody got excited and added us before the front page has even been finished. =P Sorry for the trouble. Amazing how you guys found and prepared to delete the entry before I even knew it existed (found the link in my Stats page). Anyway, keep up the great work, and I can't wait til we're notable enough to earn a legitimate entry. =)

Not only is this site non notable, it hasn't opened for business yet. JJay 01:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. - JJay 01:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• If this becomes an influential site, I'd love to see an article on it. Until it does, however, I'm gonna go for delete -- good intentions and crystal balls just aren't enough. -- Captain Disdain 02:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original Research. D. G. 03:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per common sense. Freshgavin 04:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Articles about such sites before the site has even opened count as crystal ballism and maybe even blatant advertising. — JIP | Talk 08:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.