Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperPage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Default to keep. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 22:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SkyscraperPage

Per Wikipedia:Websites. Alexa rank of 17,448. Nothing links to the page. Page is nothing more than a description of the site, without any explanation of why it might be notable. Maccoinnich 17:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• Great Alexa rank and if verified a pretty good userbase (site is currently offline). Include link to main site in skyscraper. Abstain on the article for now.- Mgm|^(talk) 22:14, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Not just any site. They provide images to the Guinness World Record Book. - Mgm|^(talk) 16:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• yeah... so if its not notable just change it to make it so. throwing the baby out with the bathwater wont make it a better child. example of the relevance of this site is the guiness book of world records get their illustrations from it.
• It shouldn't be removed. It meets the criteria for a notable website. It has a pretty good Alexa rank of 17,488, a forums with 10,000 members, and its diagrams have been used in many newspapers, and books, as well as online. The website is also significant because of its unique "diagrams". I have updated the article to reflect SkyscraperPage's significance, though I still need to edit it for easy reading.
• Given its international presence, vast database, sheer number of users and Not-for-Profit attitude, I can't see why this entry should be removed.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.