Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperPage (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 10:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SkyscraperPage

SkyscraperPage (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:WEB. What news there is, seems to be mainly trivial coverage or mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Hu12 16:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. The previous AfD closed as Keep, but required that the article be referenced. The references added, though they do improve the article, are not sufficient to address the concerns of the previous AfD or the dictates of WP:WEB. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 17:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The references don't even refer to the site. Stifle (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to skyscrapers. Rates a mention and a link for anyone interested in skyscrapers, but not really an article of its own. Mandsford 01:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. per my nom. --Hu12 17:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It certainly should be a link on Skyscraper (and is), but I see no need for it to have its own article. Acroterion _(talk) 19:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.