Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperCity (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 00:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SkyscraperCity

SkyscraperCity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unremarkable website. Unable to find references to add. Ranked #68,937 on Quantcast. [1] Failed Prod Toddst1 (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

• Weak keep - There appears to be some press mentions, but are behind pay walls. [2], [3], [4]. -- Whpq (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:WEB. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Not a very significant fan-site, current article fails WP:WEB and I could not find any strong independent reliable sources which would allow the article to do so. Camaron | Chris (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.