Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyler technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Glen 03:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Skyler technology

Judging by the fact that this article was created by an editor whose only other edits are adding to other articles a couple internal links to this article, I would say the article pretty clearly qualifies as spam. It reads like a press release or corporate website "About" page, and the article's subject appears to be a small, non-notable California technology company with only one product. There are no links to the page from other articles, now that I have reverted the article creator's two edits to other articles on the grounds that they were link spam. I placed the article up for proposed deletion, but the article creator removed the template. Nevertheless, I feel this article is unencyclopedic and amounts to little more than an advertisement or corporate directory entry, and should be deleted. --Slowking Man 03:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom; fails both the WP:CORP and WP:ADS criterias.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. SkipSmith 08:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam. MER-C 08:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam. MidgleyDJ 11:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing I can find other than press releases and a trivial mention in ComputerWorld, making it lack reliable sources. ColourBurst 22:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Arbusto 23:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.