Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyblazer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 19:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Skyblazer

Skyblazer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable software. The majority of the article is game guide material. Of the two references provided, one has no text - hence is not admissible. Prod was contested via email. MER-C 03:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Just got your message, and noticed the articles for deletion thing a little while before. Sorry about the game guide (I'm new when it comes to the more specific Wiki rules, although I admit I had basically thrown a few sentences on I could think of.) I'll definitely remove the textless link and try to post more specifics. What specifically do you mean by "you've convinced me that it needs some wider attention," when you also note that it is "non-notable software?" I will try to make it conform to a style similar to that of any other game wiki when I have the chance in the next day or two (taxes and lots of other work have kept my busy.) -Thermal0xidizer

• Keep, a Sony SNES game that had a worldwide release. [1]. Online sources for mediocre flops from the pre-Internet age aren't always easy to find, but there are certain to be reviews in the print magazines of the time. WP:SOFTWARE is not policy and nothing in the article is really game guide material.--Nydas^(Talk) 11:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per Nydas. Article needs so rearranging and rewrite, but seems notable enough. Few more reputable sources would be ideal, but indisputably was a worldwide NSES release. Goodnightmush 16:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• comment Just did a considerable overhaul. How much closer to a keep? --Thermal0xidizer
• deleteper MER-C. The article does not assert notability. It also is something akin to a gameplayers user guide. If we delete the parts that don't belong, the article is just the context lead, and then it still has no qualifying sources. Jerry 22:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - per Goodnightmush's finding. Sony game with wide release. In response to the last comment, just being a SNES game asserts "notability." --Oakshade 06:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.