Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SklogWiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 02:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SklogWiki

SklogWiki (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A wiki that does not appear to be notable or have been written about by secondary reliable sources. Lack of sources and no claims of meeting WP:WEB. PROD was removed by article creator without comment with notice on talk page. The external links are all largely irrelevant to the subject and the only actual source is a brief article that doesn't even mention SklogWiki. Only 33 Google hits for this (15 unique). Delete as failing WP:ATT and WP:WEB. Wickethewok 15:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

  • "PROD was removed by article creator without comment."

An extensive comment was made on the said talk/discussion page. If there was a more adequate place for such discussions than I am sorry for any inconvenience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.111.20.5 (talk • contribs)

  • Ah, you're right, I wrote that based on the lack of edit summary and didn't notice the talk page until afterwards. Wickethewok 17:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Only 33 Google hits for this (15 unique)

This is indeed true; the SklogWiki was started on the 15 of February this year. I have not spent a lot of time promoting it as yet for the following reason. The domain *.sklogwiki.org has been purchased, but since SklogWiki is hosted in a national laboratory, so meetings had to be held to see whether an external page could be served up from an internal host. Today that go-ahead was given, and hopefully within the next 72 hours SklogWiki can be found via www.sklogwiki.org. Once this is so I shall start the "promotion" via the large number of scientific mailing lists that are either open-acces or that I have access to. --161.111.20.5 17:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - This is a non-notable website. As stated above, a Google search returns very few pages on the website. The article effectively amounts to an advertisement, even if the website is an *.org website. Dr. Submillimeter 15:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Could in principle become notable later, if it gains any visibility and becomes successful, but should not be part of the encyclopedia now. Anville 19:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The site is just a stub of a wiki at this time (and seems to only contain stubs). It could become a notable site later, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --EMS | Talk 04:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.