Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skeet (slang)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Glen  01:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Skeet (slang)

Unreferenced and rather unorganized collection of unrelated lewd slang definitions GilliamJF 19:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

• keep. Clear evidence of use in 3 pop cultures, complete with where it can be found in recordings. It appears to me that a good faith attempt to document that usage is presented. This article needs attention, and a lot of trimming, but doesn't merit complete deletion. Unfocused 04:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

• keep. Article seems to contain relevant information. As usual wikipedia seems to be the only place to find definitions of these "newer" terms. Would be a shame to lose this information. (OsbornW) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.218.214.121 (talk • contribs) . — 69.218.214.121 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete The exception in WP:NOT 1.2.3 reads, "In some special cases an article about an essential piece of slang may be appropriate." I don't think this qualifies as "essential". The Literate Engineer 04:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete If Wikipedia is the "only place to find definitions of these 'newer' terms" then it is not notable. Resolute
• Delete Largely unverified original research. Not that that matters since wikipedia is not an (urban) dictionary. -- IslaySolomon | talk 05:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. hateless 06:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The comment As usual wikipedia seems to be the only place to find definitions of these "newer" terms reveals both the fundamental problems with the article, and a fundamental misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is here for. Take it to Urban Dictionary. Guy 11:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor a place for repellent rubbish. Moreschi 13:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki some to wikt. --Rory096 19:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not urban dictionary (we should really add that). -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 20:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — For a start, WP:NOT a dictionary, and WP:NEO says that we don't accept neologisms, which this appears to be (failing that, it's just as bad - a protologism). Martinp23 21:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Aow, delete delete delete Danny Lilithborne 01:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.