Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixth method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 15:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sixth method

Non-notable music group. Delete --Quarl 10:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Please put more effort into your nominations. Instead of saying "non-notable", explain why it's non-notable. I suspect your problem here might be that you completely forgot to nominate in the rush to get your nice bolded vote written. What do you think? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I've been imitating the amount of explanation other nn-music nominations have. No claimed notability. Unverifiable - no relevant google hits for "sixth method". Formed in 2005. --Quarl 12:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Cheers. There are a lot of bodgy nominations on any given AfD daylog. Most of the articles that get nominated are drek, but we owe it to the 5% that aren't to make sure our nominations clearly explain why we believe something should be deleted. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable enough with information given. VegaDark 11:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per User:VegaDark. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Clearly does not meet WP:MUSIC --- Charles Stewart 19:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy--nixie 05:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.