Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Kubigula (talk) 06:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sixel

Sixel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

no claim of notability Montchav (talk) 20:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. Sixel is obviously not a very important format now, and probably wasn't in its heyday. It does have a bit of significance, though, and I've added a couple of minor references, which were about all I could find. Tim Ross·^talk 11:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Weak keep: per Tim Ross's comments. Mh29255 (talk) 14:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Tim Ross. More-than-adequate sourcing, a suitable topic for Wikipedia (cf:Hercules Graphics Card). Tevildo (talk) 21:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.