Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Scott Rashap

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 23:26, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sir Scott Rashap

Ingenious hoax. Such a person never existed. 0 googles, no hits in the Times Digital Archive, and checking the knightage for the appropriate years shows no-one of any such name or similar name. Too subtle for BJAODN? David | Talk 15:14, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete hoax. You've got to give the credit for putting so much thought into completely fabricating something, though. He'd probably do well in politics ;-) -Soltak 21:50, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. --OntarioQuizzer 21:52, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as non-verifiable fabrication. Hall Monitor 20:43, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Not currently a speedy category, I think. David | Talk 21:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
    • You mean to say that complete fabrications can't be speedied? --OntarioQuizzer 03:25, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
      • They can't be speedied as such, only if they fit into one of the other criteria for Speedy deletion. Obvious complete fabrications have been speedied under 'patent nonsense', eg claims that an unknown person was President of the United States recently, but this one certainly isn't obvious like that. David | Talk 08:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.