Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Phiroze Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speeedy keep: complete rewrite (was a personal attack). mikka (t) 23:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sir Phiroze Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy

Offensive, personal attack Muntfish 13:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete this article as it stands. Muntfish 14:03, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment ... however this might actually be a notable person - Bombay Stock Exchange links here, and Google turns up various legitimate pages under the alternate spelling Phiroze Jamshedji Jeejeebhoy. There's also a WP article at Jamsetjee Jeejebhoy but I'm not 100% sure it's exactly the same person. Muntfish 14:03, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Malicious attack on a real person.Bwithh 14:30, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup, as it appears to be the same person. Here's a quote from one of the results, "The BSE is housed in the 28-storied Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers in the same place where the old building once stood. Sir Phiroze Jamshedji Jeejeebhoy was the Chairman of the [Bombay Stock Exchange] Exchange from 1966 till his death in 1980." -- Kjkolb 14:45, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Agree that this is the same person that's referred to in the context of the Bombay SE - therefore notable and deserving an article. However this article as it stands now needs way more than just a cleanup - more like throw away and start again. I'm guessing that Jamsetjee Jeejebhoy is related somehow, perhaps an ancestor? Someone knowledgeable needs to sort this out. Muntfish 15:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Keep But in future best not to move pages that are on AfD.Rich Farmbrough 16:27, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, it was a moronic move on my part, I failed to consider that a redirect wouldn't work for the article's deletion tag. Sorry everybody. I've got to get some sleep. I rewrote it as best I could with the limited information I could find. It's very short, though. -- Kjkolb 16:31, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep since its now cleaned up. User:Nichalp/sg 17:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.