Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Joseph Hood, 1st Baronet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball keep, eight valid "keep"s in as many hours is obviously a case for WP:SNOW. As Lankiveil said, nobility usually equals notability; furthermore, sources were added to the article during the discussion. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters wish you a Merry Fishmas! • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sir Joseph Hood, 1st Baronet

Sir Joseph Hood, 1st Baronet (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable Baron, without sources and already speedied once. I cannot find any sources on the man, and am not sure if he is/was even notable even if I could find some. Jmlk17 09:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep. What in earth is a 'non-notable Baron'? The man was a UK member of parliament, the mayor of Wimbledon, and was made a Baronet. Blatantly notable. Search for "Sir Joseph Hood" in Google - you should find the same sources I found, and have now added to the article.--Michig (talk) 09:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep He was an MP and so notable per Wikipedia:Notability (people) - politician in national legislature. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Obvious Keep as Michig and Colonel Warden make abundantly clear. Nick mallory (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, nobility is usually considered notable, an MP is usually considered notable, and he was deputy chairman of a major company. I'm not sure what else exactly you want. Lankiveil (talk) 13:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Keep He was a baronet (hereditary knight), not a baron (member of the House of Lords). Still, nobody gets created a baronet unless they've done more than enough to be notable.--Habashia (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Snowball keep anyone? Passes WP:BIO for me...--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Snowball keep I would if I had the balls Computerjoe's talk 15:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Clearly a keep. I would close this except I've edited the article. The version that got speedied didn't have any details and only used "Bt", an abbreviation perhaps unfamiliar to some. Gimmetrow 16:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.