Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinosteel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, should have been speedily kept due to the nominator being blocked as an AfD troll, but doesn't matter now :). Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 00:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sinosteel

Sinosteel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

non notable companies. N1333 19:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep According to this news article the business did $3.8 billion U.S. dollars in sales in 2005, with steady growth projected for 2006 and 2007. That seems like an awfully lot of money for a company that fails notability. Also, with over 30K G-hits, it seems noteworthy. Expansion is sorely needed, but I think we should keep it. Dallben 20:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Dallben, this is both notable and verifiable, but obviously needs expansion. Daveydweeb (^chat/_review!) 22:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep see above (Katie Leung), N1333 has been blocked indefinitely as an AfD vandal. Can probably close this as a speedy keep. --Canley 12:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Very notable. Even current Google News shows 38 current news articles [1]. 2nd larges ore producer in most populated nation on earth. --Oakshade 04:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.