Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single serving sites
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, not-notable neologism --Stephen 01:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Single serving sites
Not notable: definition of days-old neologism; not covered anywhere except a popular blog and a few less-popular ones. I proposed the article for deletion, but the tag was removed. There is significant discussion of this on its talk page already. Dreamyshade (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. RogueNinjatalk 01:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete self-admitted neologism: "While the term was not coined until 2008..." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Tonywalton Talk 23:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a useful article, and in deleting it Wikipedia is making itself less relevant and usable. (By the way, "per nom" votes are discouraged.) Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 07:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral. The term exists but the sourcing could be better. I'm near certain we are going to see this article come back to Wikipedia with better third party referencing down the road. RFerreira (talk) 18:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - lack of media coverage. Addhoc (talk) 23:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I simply don't see how this can be reliably sourced. This is not the Wikipedia of old where anything made up on a blog one day can have an article; blogs have very limited utility for notability purposes. --Dhartung | Talk 08:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.