Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon richardson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 01:35, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Simon richardson

  • I was going to speedy, but this seems like perfect BJAODN fodder. Karmafist 15:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Probably delete, but you could maybe have waited more than 2 minutes before tagging it for deletion. Punkmorten 15:51, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
2 minutes or 2 hours, garbage is garbage. If this is indicative of what he plans to write later, there isn't much hope for this article. I was on Welcoming Patrol, so I was keeping an eye on the Recent Changes. Karmafist 16:39, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Ouch! Speedy delete before he actually spends any time filling this out. -- DS1953 15:53, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete written by a user with a 'red' user page, looks like the start of a user page, prob a 'user page' in error, the welcoming committee haven't even got there yet. Alf 15:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
I'll contact him now. Karmafist 16:41, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Userfy. A quick Google and Galenet search showed there doesn't seem to be anyone notable with that name. Capitalistroadster 00:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Dottore So 05:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. --Agamemnon2 11:28, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy. Be bold in tagging such junk for speedy deletion. --DrTorstenHenning 13:56, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.