Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simcountry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 03:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Simcountry

Basically an ad, plus it is gamecruft Buckner 1986 00:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:CORP. SynergeticMaggot 03:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spamtastic! --Xrblsnggt 03:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above -- Alias Flood 03:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I've played this game, and it's fun if you're into this kind of thing. That said, this definitely fails WP:WEB (which I think applies more than WP:CORP in this case), and doesn't have an outstanding Alexa ranking or Ghit count (200 unique). -- H·G (^words/_works) 05:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, pick a category. However, how can it be gamecruft when it's only one line long? Yes, I know, one line is too many. However, I always though cruft was generally used to refer to things that are in popular articles, but obscure. This is unpopular _and_ obscure. --ColourBurst 06:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:WEB, WP:CORP, and WP:NOT (since it's not a soapbox). -- Grinnblade 07:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB, Unless I'm missing something in the page history, this does not seem to qualify as an advertisement. However, it also does not seem to notable enough to bother with an article. --Topkai22 11:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:How many should i name?? Childzy ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 12:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Voice of Treason 14:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Geofiction article. — Michael J 15:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.