Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvia Treves

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. 6 Delete / 3 Keep -- AllyUnion (talk) 14:39, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Silvia Treves

The reason was given in the edit summary when the vfd tag was added. From the page history:

00:15, 2004 Dec 20 User:RC T. (This is obviously someone's inside joke -- REMOVE)

This was improperly and not completely posted to VfD. I'm finishing the process. No vote. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-13 16:06 Z

• Delete -- appears to be a vanity page, the few Google results are mostly identical vanity listings in other open access encyclopediae and dictionaries. HyperZonk 16:38, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Vain nonsense - do we really need to know about her cooking? Brookie 17:43, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep — the two publications she's said to edit/manage seem genuine (one has a Wikipedia article created by the same person who created this one, but mention of the other was added to the Fata Morgana page by Wetman). It needs thorough rewriting, though, both in terms of its English and its style. (Incidentally, I got 506 hits on Google, including a publisher's page for a book to which she wrote the introduction, fiction magazines in which her stories have appeared, an academic journal of Chemistry of which she's an editor, etc.) The fact that the article contains irrelevancies is a reason for editing it, not for deleting it. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:44, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 00:31, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this is self-promotion. Wyss 01:34, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If notable, this article fails to demonstrate it. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:05, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, looks non-notable and almost vanity. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:07, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, with rewrite. JamesBurns 07:59, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.