Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silly-not-to

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 00:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Silly-not-to

Little used neologism. At best belongs in Wiktionary. Weregerbil 23:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as non-notable idiom / figure-of-speech. Wikipedia is not a dictionary (but Wiktionary is). —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-27 23:25Z
  • Delete. Silly not to. --Lockley 23:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • No sources cited for widespread use of thios as a meme or a phrase symbolic of a life style or culture trend. If reliabele sources are cited tot hsi effect thsi should be kept. but otherwise not. Delete. DES (talk) 23:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above. -- gtdp [T]/[C] 00:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete neologism "attributed to a locally renound Surrey disc jockey. " Ruby 00:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. --Latinus 00:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • hardly a neologism - the nearest it comes to that is adding hyphens to a looong-used phrase. But that's all it is: A phrase. An idiom. A figure of speech. As such, if belongs in Wiktionary (without the hyphens), but should be deleted from Wikipedia. Grutness...wha? 03:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Neutralitytalk 17:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Says this Wiktionarian, no thank you. It's not really idiomatic enough to merit an entry in Wikt, either. — Dvortygirl 17:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete. Definately a thoroughly precise definition I back it up completely! This deserves a place in wikipedia for ever. James —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.151.254.50 (talk • contribs)
User's first edit. Aecis Mr. Mojo risin' 22:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.