Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikkimese people
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sikkimese people
Delete unsourced one-liner that the Sikkimese people are those who inhabit the Indian state of Sikkim, not overly encyclopedic, but we can quickly geto 50 more articles by writing identical ones for each US state, and probably run to the next millionth article by doing this with each county's subdivision... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect for now to Sikkim#Demographics. GtstrickyTalk or C 20:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I'm glad it got nominated, since, admittedly, there's plenty of room for improvement on this one. I've added some basic information from the cited source; Nepali people are 2/3rds of the population, followed by Bhutanese and original Lapta inhabitants. I encourage anyone else who wants to urge a keep to take time to contribute to the article. Mandsford (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep great fix by NickPenguin. EJF (talk) 23:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, excellent WP:HEY work by Mandsford and Nick Penguin especially. This could as easily have been brought to the attention of a WikiProject. --Dhartung | Talk 03:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- keep-encyclopedic topic, if only stub yet. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Sikkim#Demographics whatever is not already there (and there isn't much) and then Redirect per Gtstricky. Michael Kinyon (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY I think this article has taken a turn in the right direction. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - per WP:HEY and comments above by Dhartung. U$er (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.