The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Vanity article, no independent sources given. Jvhertum 13:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete unless verifiable non-trivial independent mentions are included by end of this AfD Alf photoman 16:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube 02:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.