Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signs of Qiyamah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect after deleting copyvio. -- RHaworth 17:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Signs of Qiyamah

Signs of Qiyamah (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I would CSD this if only I can figure out a criteria for it. Copyvio., lack of context, .... KTC 09:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. -- → AA ^(talk) — 10:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Qiyamah. → AA ^(talk) — 10:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no resemblance to an encyclopedia article.Proabivouac 10:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment - It is a terms that is often search so a redirect is appropriate. However, I do agree with your sentiments on the contents as it currently stands. Maybe delete (to get rid of the copyvio) and then create a redirect? → AA ^(talk) — 10:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Qiyamah until someone edits the signs section on that pgae to warrant a subarticle. I have for the time being redirected the page to get rid of the copyvio (and horrible formatting). I don't think there is a need for this afd anymore but I'll let another admin close it. Pepsidrinka 14:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.