Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Xi Epsilon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sigma Xi Epsilon

Sigma Xi Epsilon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable local fraternity. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Can't find anything on google about this particular fraternity in a third-party source. Good Ol’factory (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete all student fraternities and clubs as inherently non-notable (with the possible exception of those very few groups which have received national press coverage). Stifle (talk) 11:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable "fraternity" or "sorority". JIP | Talk 17:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, no reliable third-party references. Non-notable fraternity. Cunard (talk) 23:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep in an obvious losing effort; all chartered fraternities and sororities at accredited institutions are inherently notable. --CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 03:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Sigma Xi Epsilon is one of only two fraternities on the Long Island Campus of St. Joseph's College, New York. Although it is smaller than many Greek organizations, it is well-known on Long Island and an entry in Wikipedia had proved useful in providing information to those seeking it. Sigma Xi Epsilon publishes an annual yearbook, and past yearbooks could be listed as references, as well as information that St. Joseph's College provides about the organization on its Web site. Would any of these changes be sufficient to keep the entry? 05:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inmy92stang (talk • contribs)
    • Comment Creator of article actually admits to violating WP:SPAM. Arsenikk (talk) 19:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:ORG, no references, news search shows nothing. An excellent specimen of an article that should be deleted. Begone. Arsenikk (talk) 19:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.