Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidwood

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 00:28, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sidwood

• del. non-notable, original research. Most of (small) number of google hits are from its webpage or close. No solid secondary references. Mikkalai 06:21, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 00:32, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• NN, thank the PTB that each char. doesn't have it's own page to be deleted too. BigFatDave 02:15, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 08:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:50, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.