Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibyll Trelawney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 00:02, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sibyll Trelawney
How is this fictional character notable outside of the Potter series? Is she even notable within the Potter series? In what way is encyclopedic notability being established here? Please discuss. --GRider\talk 22:44, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- GRider, please tell me what you think should happen to Sibyll Trelawney. It is your responsiblity as nominator to clearly tell your fellow Wikipedians what you think should happen as a result of the nomination. —Markaci 2005-03-15 T 23:07 Z
- Keep, she is notable outside Potterville because Emma Thompson played her. Kappa 23:27, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Important character from a very famous book series. More than 100,000+ Google Hits if we search under "Professor Trelawney", "Prof. Trelawney", "Sibyll Trelawney, and "Sybil Trelawney". These nominations are starting to get a little silly. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:10, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Very Strong Keep. Are you joking? Sibyll was played by Emma Thompson in the last movie. Surely you've heard of her? DaveTheRed 01:55, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- 'Comment. I notice Ms Thompson also played Elinor Dashwood in Sense and Sensibility - and there is no article for that character. Average Earthman 09:22, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- No, of course I didn't mean that any character played by Emma Thompson is encyclopedic. I meant that this particular character in Harry Potter was played by a big hollywood actress, and was therefore obviously notable. But you already knew that, didn't you? DaveTheRed 02:52, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sure you don't mean that every single character played by a major Hollywood star deserves an article - e.g. if someone created an article for the characters played by George Clooney or John Travolta in Thin Red Line, it would be a deserved deletion case. Notable actors, notable film, but clearly not notable characters (since they're just cameos). Your argument is too general. Average Earthman 12:18, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- My argument was obviously not intended to extend beyond Harry Potter movies. DaveTheRed 18:44, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sure you don't mean that every single character played by a major Hollywood star deserves an article - e.g. if someone created an article for the characters played by George Clooney or John Travolta in Thin Red Line, it would be a deserved deletion case. Notable actors, notable film, but clearly not notable characters (since they're just cameos). Your argument is too general. Average Earthman 12:18, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- No, of course I didn't mean that any character played by Emma Thompson is encyclopedic. I meant that this particular character in Harry Potter was played by a big hollywood actress, and was therefore obviously notable. But you already knew that, didn't you? DaveTheRed 02:52, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- 'Comment. I notice Ms Thompson also played Elinor Dashwood in Sense and Sensibility - and there is no article for that character. Average Earthman 09:22, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. WP:POINT. —Korath (Talk) 05:16, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 05:38, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, of course. Xezbeth 05:57, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as one of the few teachers expanded upon in the books. Appears in all Potter books starting from the third, and has major (if subtle) plot influence. Radiant! 08:34, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Likely to be searched for and fairly notable Harry Potter character especially with the predictions. Capitalistroadster 10:28, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Obviously; reasons stated above Lectonar 11:11, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I like the Harry Potter universe much more than the Pokémon universe, and Trelawnwey is a major character. She makes two important prophecies, one of which guides the entire Order of Phoenix novel. Not even close for deletion. Sjakkalle 09:43, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- keep notable charecter, who makes important prophecies which are central to the plot. kaal 20:01, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- This nomination is not correctly formed. Please read the instructions. Chris 03:01, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Although she is characterised as being flakey, she made an important prediction shortly before Harry's birth which is pivotal to book 5 and JKR has strongly hinted that it will be a part of book 6. Colin Angus Mackay 00:52, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
