Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shwing.com

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to delete on the grounds of being advertising. -- ChrisO 21:41, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shwing.com

Looks like advertising. Xcali 00:32, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• I have a suprise for her too: delete as adcruft. I would be willing to bet that the logo is a copyvio as it has no source info. - Lucky13pjn 00:44, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertisement Linuxbeak | Desk 03:14, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advert Nateji77 04:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising. Megan1967 04:50, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advert. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:16, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• D ad Fawcett5 04:16, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NeoJustin 08:45, May 31 2005 (UTC)
• Keep informative - Oneaday -- Hi,I saw mySpace.com and did not think Shwing.com would be a problem. And what do you mean about logo is copyvio? BTW, I was waiting till after exams to tell her so it wouldn't look like I was sucking up. I won't be embarrassed if it's deleted. Do what you have to do, but IMHO, independent websites should be rewarded and not punished.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.