Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shutterstock (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, needs improvement. 1 != 2 23:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shutterstock

Shutterstock (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Advert Hu12 (talk) 17:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep. The subject of the article appears to be notable, but more sources would be needed to solidify it. All of the text about how the company works could easily be sourced to the company's website itself; there should be no problems with this if only straight fact is sourced this way. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 17:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - notable in the photo world, it just needs more references. Just as notable as IStockPhoto. - Gtstricky (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.