Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short Pump Elementary School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per improvements in article during AFD. Davewild (talk) 22:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Short Pump Elementary School
This was deleted once previously by proposed deletion, re-created, and proposed for deletion again. Since prodding twice is invalid, we go to AfD. The prod reason given this time was "no evidence of notability"; similar notability concerns were raised the previous time, too. Although this is mostly a procedural nomination, these concerns seem valid to me, barring evidence to the contrary. — TKD::Talk 18:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- delete - no reliabe sources for establishement of notability in a verifiable manner. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't a notable elementary school. Icestorm815 (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It is notable enough for me. Zginder (talk) 22:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. does not assert notability besides saying "we're great." (more or less). Keeper | 76 22:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)changing position to Keep based on recent additions to article, that IMO, assert notability per WP:OUTCOMES, specifically educational institutions that have won academic awards in their respective field, (albeit Elementary, still notable). Keeper | 76 19:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)- Can you please hold on because it is still ghetting work. Im trying to work on it as hard as is can. Please help me on it thanks Roxmysoxo::Talk To Me —Preceding comment was added at 23:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep recognition by the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, supported by reliable and verifiable sources, satisfies the Wikipedia:Notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 06:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.