Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoemoney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shoemoney

Podcasts, SEO, webmaster. Nothing in there which speaks to WP:BIO. 166 unique Googles for "Jeremy Schoemaker", lots for shoemoney as you'd expect given he's an SEO merchant. Reliable secondary sources for biographical data look to be thin on the ground. Just zis Guy you know? 15:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• delete In retrospect, Tychocat is correct. I withdraw my objection to deletion.Quasifrodo 17:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for failing WP:BIO, per my regularly-stated inability to find multiple third-party non-trivial articles about the subject. Also, article appears to fail WP:V regarding statements of being "noted" and "gaining popularity". I realize these noms are supposed to be a discussion, but I'd wish you folks would flat-out state your desired action here. Also, Quasifrodo appears at the bottom of the article in an apparent signature? What's up with that? Tychocat 22:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Tychocat. --Aguerriero (talk) 04:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.