Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoe Shopping

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was BJAODN and delete. – ABCD 19:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shoe Shopping

Article does nothing but rehash title. Self-explanatory. Delete. Andrew pmk 06:18, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Agree, not encyclopedic. Delete.--Plainsong 06:24, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Unintentionally hilarious. Prime BJAODN, IMO. :) Delete as experiment. - Lucky 6.9 07:15, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete lest we open the floodgates for spatula shopping, runcible-spoon shopping, rhubarb pie shopping etc. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:00, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "Necessity is not required to initiate a "Shoe Shopping" event" I think translates into English as "You can never have too many shoes". Important advice I'm sure, but hardly encyclopedic. Then again, I'm sad enough to be amused by this too so possibly BJAODN. SteveW | Talk 14:29, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Miscapitalized title, self-referential, no useful information that can't be seen from the title. I think this is a speedy delete candidate, but let's copy it to BJAODN first. Mgm|^(talk) 14:35, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN Into the land of dreams and socks. Klonimus 07:58, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.